|
The
last two issues of Newsline have drawn attention to the
earlier activities of the FMCEC, particularly during the
past 25 years, culminating in David Barrell’s retirement
as Director
General. When planning for the future we can frequently
gain from looking at the past. What follows is a reminder
of its activities for the benefit of crane manufacturers,
by Alan Skipper, who for over 25 years was the Director
of the Crane Group in the Federation.
In
Part 1 of the Review of the FMCEC, David referred to the
Association of Crane Makers having been absorbed into the
Federation. One of the aims of this was to bring under one
umbrella the manufacturers of mobile cranes who had been
split between the two organisations. A Cranes and Excavators
Group was formed with representation on Council. Within
the Group sections were set up for mobile cranes and excavators,
electric overhead travelling (EOT) cranes and steelworks
cranes, dockside cranes and tower cranes. Later another
section represented lifting equipment manufacturers, following
the absorption of the Lifting Equipment Manufacturers Association.
All
this took place just before an extremely tough time for
the engineering industry. As at that time a large part of
the home market for British heavy crane makers was in the
public sector and nationalised industries, due to cuts in
public expenditure 90% of the home market had disappeared.
Various
meetings took place with Government to make them aware of
the problems facing the crane sector. Meetings were held
with the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, the
Secretary of State for Transport, officials from the Department
of Trade and Industry, the Central Electricity Generating
Board, the Naval Dockyards and the Ports authorities. At
that time the crane makers were represented on the Mechanical
Handling Sector Working Party which had been set up by the
National Economic Development Office and the concerns of
the crane industry were also voiced at its various meetings.
The
crane makers had always been strong on technical and safety
matters and technical committees were set up within the
FMCEC to co-ordinate work on standards and legislation affecting
cranes and excavators. The FMCEC also took over UK representation
of the crane makers and the lifting equipment manufacturers
in the European organisation, Fédération Européenne de la
Manutention (FEM). FMCEC members played a leading part in
the work of FEM on technical and commercial matters.
The
crane makers had suffered from the proliferation of standards
and legislation and were pleased therefore to play a very
active part in the work of standardisation through the British
Standards Institution and the International Standards Organisation
and subsequently in the European standards work through
the Committee Européenne Norme. As a result of the UK joining
the Common Market it became even more important for the
crane makers to have a representative organisation as efforts
were made to eliminate the differences in standards and
legislation in Europe.
With
a view to ensuring the continuation of expertise in the
crane industry an annual residential training course was
run by the FMCEC at Loughborough University for young engineers
employed by member companies. One of the main objects of
the course was to broaden the knowledge of the younger technicians
employed by members. Experts in a wide field of relevant
subjects gave lectures and the courses were much valued
by those who attended.
A
considerable amount of work was also undertaken on a proposal
that there should be a Centre of Excellence, which would
have been a focal point for the advancement of British crane
and lifting equipment technology. Meetings took place with
appropriate universities but, unfortunately, there were
various problems and although it was agreed that the idea
was an excellent one it could not proceed. Government financial
assistance was obtained for the carrying out of a comparative
study of Standards for EOT cranes. The main objective of
the study was to collect and compare British, Overseas and
International Standards relating to such cranes and their
components. This enabled a commentary to be prepared on
the main differences between the standards and on the effect
these had on resulting crane designs. A comprehensive volume
was produced with a restricted circulation to FMCEC members.
On
the commercial side comprehensive marketing statistics were
produced for all the
product sectors within the Group. These were mostly produced
on a monthly basis on a non-disclosure basis and covered
totals of orders received and invoiced sales. The FMCEC
encouraged the development of international versions. In
addition a number of overseas trade missions to the difficult
countries in the world (China, Korea, Iran and Iraq to name
a few) gave many UK crane makers a chance to assess market
opportunities and meet senior representatives of public
and other purchasing organisations. These facilities still
exist within the FMCEC but sadly there are not as many UK
crane manufacturers now as there were. Model conditions
of sale were drawn up which were made available to members.
Following
a visit by an inward mission from China an outward mission
to that country was organised by the Group in view of the
interest which the Chinese had shown in mechanical handling
equipment. A full programme of discussions and visits took
place and the mission was most helpful in appraising members
of the Chinese market for their equipment.
Although
much work had been done the early 1980’s again saw a difficult
time for the crane industry and members were unsettled by
proposals for a much larger organisation for the mechanical
handling industry. As a result some key players withdrew
from the FMCEC and the Group had to be disbanded.
We
hope you have enjoyed reading about the earlier activities
of the Federation - let us know your views on current and
previous items.
|