Newsline - September 2000

Back to news topics | Next news topic

TECHNICAL NEWS

ENGINE EXAUST EMISSIONS - The issue of Stage 3 emissions is important to OEMs as the after treatment of exhaust gases is the responsibility of the original equipment manufacturer. The European Commission has announced its intention to allow the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take the lead in order to ensure harmonisation between the US and Europe. The main European input is from EUROMOT, the engine manufacturers association, but it is important that the views of construction equipment manufacturers are also taken into account.

NOISE

Directive 2000/14/EC relating to the noise emission in the environment by equipment used outdoors has been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Member States are required to transpose the Directive by 3 July 2001 and the provisions become mandatory on 3 January 2002. Between these two dates manufacturers have the option of applying the provisions of the Directive or the legislation currently in force. The DTI is responsible for the regulations in the UK and a draft for public consultation is expected in December.

YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION

The CECE Technical Commission could not unanimously agree to its draft position at the recent meeting in Frankfurt, as the German representatives continued to defend their practice of pre-dating machines from 1 October. In accordance with current CECE Statutes, it was agreed that two position papers would be published, each including a list of the national associations supporting it. In the meantime, the FMCEC is working with the DTI Action Single Market Unit to bring pressure on the Gerfnan authorities to conform with European law.

MACHINERY DIRECTIVE

The fourth revision of the proposed amendment to the Machinery Directive has now been drafted by the European Commission DG Enterprise but has not yet been circulated to Member States or industry bodies. However, the Commission has appointed a consultant to conduct a cost benefit study and a questionnaire regarding the proposed revision has been sent to European industry bodies. The FMCEC has established the main changes - full details available from Tim Faithfull or Bill Osbome.

HSE/FMCEC BRIEFING ON VIBRATION

A briefing meeting, jointly organised by the HSE and the FMCEC, was held earlier this year to provide industry with details and the likely impact of the proposed Commission Directive which addresses the issue of risks due to vibration in workplaces.

The proposed hand-arm and wholebody vibration values (action and limit values are being proposed) remain the most contentious parts of the proposal. These values could lead to workplace situations where employees could exceed the required vibration dose values and employers would have to prevent, or at least place time-limits on, the use of some equipment. Equipment manufacturers have serious concerns that some equipment could consequently be restricted or disappear from the marketplace.

An industry view was presented by the FMCEC which described an example of a concrete breaker operator who would exceed the limit value for hand-arm vibration in one hour and a loader operator who would exceed the whole-body limit value well before the end of a normal working day.

Also described were the exorbitant costs of vibration tests and the inadequacy of current test codes which did not cover the multitude of variables that occur when equipment is operated.

The HSE supported the principle of the proposal but had reservations about the requirements for wholebody vibration and for imposing limit values. The hand-arm proposals were broadly consistent with HSE guidance in the UK (although the proposed values were lower than HSE guidance or recommended values) but the whole-body proposals were not consistent with the UK and were based on incomplete scientific knowledge.

The HSE explained that the meeting in January 2000, called by the Portuguese Presidency, had not been followed up and the future of the proposal was not clear. It was unlikely that any UK regulations would appear before 2003 at the earliest, with a transition/derogation period of not less than five years.

An FMCEC position paper on the proposal is available on request.

 

FMCEC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

Chairman:
Vice Chairman:
Technical Manager:
Technical Officer:

Mick Smith
David Wootton
Tim Faithfull
Bill Osborne

JCB
Caterpillar
FMCEC
FMCEC